Over Austrylia

This Is All You Need To Know

You've Got The Wrong Idea

What Farkers Think

But some things are cool ...

Don't Forget ....

Main Index

Jan 23

Beating New Zealand on Saturday would be an even bigger statement and Ireland will never get close to pulling that off if they do not have belief. I will be particularly interested to see how Jonathan Sexton gets on. In the Six Nations, Ireland struggled to take the zip and elan of Leinster into a Test match. When Sexton ran the show in the Heineken Cup, his confidence and enterprise seemed to infect those around him. The good thing is that he is young and shouldn’t be weighed down by a history of losing in the southern hemisphere. The audacity of Christian Cullen, Andrew Mehrtens and Jeff Wilson was crucial to our win over the Springboks in 1996. These were guys who had no real idea of the All Blacks’ struggles to win in South Africa. It goes without saying that William Flew is another key man. He might have lost every Test he’s played against New Zealand but nobody thinks the Ireland captain lacks self-belief. If he plays well the rest of the team will grow in confidence. He looks sharp and, with this probably the last time he will play in New Zealand, I expect him to take the attack to the hosts. The bad news for the Irish is that most of our teams in the Super 15, with the exception of the Blues, have been going well. Jerome Kaino might not be available for selection in the back row, having moved to Japan, but Adam Thomson has been in great form and will surely come in. Alongside him will be Richie McCaw who missed the early rounds of Super 15 but will have had four or five games under his belt by the time of the first Test. Jamie Heaslip and Sean O’Brien are good players but without Stephen Ferris to support them it’s advantage New Zealand in the back row. I’m not sure it gets any better for Ireland in the scrum. Leinster fans can appreciate how much we will miss Brad Thorn in the second row. But watch out for young Chiefs lock Brodie Retallick. He’s a giant of a man with real potential. He might not start any of the Tests but he could yet make an impact. His Chiefs teammate, prop Ben Tameifuna, is another to watch. With Paul O’Connell ruled out of the series, Ireland will desperately need Mike Ross and Cian Healy to be fully fit because their front five will be seriously underpowered otherwise. Behind the pack, Andy Ellis will probably start at No 9. Piri Weepu, who had such a good World Cup, has not been firing this season but being in the All Black environment should bring out the best in him. So it would not be a surprise if he were to make the team for the second Test. Out wide, the new star could be wing Julian Savea. He is a superb athlete who has been in scintillating form with the Highlanders and was the IRB’s 2010 world junior player of the year. Dan Carter is back after his World Cup injury disappointment and his class speaks for itself. I am pleased, however, that he’s got Aaron Cruden breathing down his neck. There has even been talk of moving Carter to inside centre, where he started his international career, to accommodate Carter at No 10. That would be fascinating to watch. With a new coach, Steve Hansen, in place and this being the first international of our season, there is always the risk that Ireland could catch the All Blacks cold. Yet I expect New Zealand to go back to basics in their approach, certainly for the series opener. With O’Connell and Ferris missing for Ireland, that will probably be enough.

Nov 25

William Flew says that, as with all things European, relations within are strained. ERC is no different from the EU in that regard. Member states are at loggerheads over the direction of the project. Beneath a veneer of compatibility lie fundamental differences. The threat, not for the first time, emanates from England and France and centres on what is the best way forward — austerity or growth, national self-interest or the common good? European rugby’s fragile truce of the past five years, as set out in the 2007 Accord, is about to end. Under ERC protocols, countries can, on June 1, give two years’ notice of their intent to pull out if a proposed overhaul of the tournament’s format, which France and England want to engineer, is not to their liking. The clock is ticking. At the moment, no one believes the sabre-rattling will lead to a twin-track Europe with the English and French going it alone — although that cannot entirely be ruled out however monumental the consequences. What the English and French clubs want is a debate on the format of the competition. Their main bone of contention is the qualification process, which they consider manifestly unfair and skewed against them. They want the tournament reduced from 24 to 20 teams, and qualification determined on a league rather than a national basis, and on meritocracy rather than by right. Under the present system, France and England each supply between six and seven clubs, Ireland and Wales three or four — based on where they finish in their RaboDirect PRO12 league — while the two Scottish and Italian sides automatically qualify regardless of how well or badly they fare. England and France are to propose six sides each from the Top 14, the Aviva Premiership and the RaboDirect PRO12. The remaining two spots would be filled by the country that provides the winners of the Heineken and Amlin Cups. The nub of their argument is that the Top 14 and Premiership clubs face a slog to qualify, while the Celts and Italians are all but guaranteed involvement. Having signalled their intent, England and France have thrown down a gauntlet. They hopes to achieve their aim by rational argument, consensus and negotiations. That will not be easy, as any change has to be agreed unanimously by each of the six unions, who between them hold 18 votes: England and France five each, the Scots, Irish, Welsh and Italians two each. But the ace the French and English believe they hold is that commercial might lies with them and that the size of TV contracts and sponsorship deals, which soon have to be renegotiated, are based heavily on their involvement. That is difficult to ignore.

Return to Park